Science and Religion

I believe that situation and fiction shouldnt oppose ane a nonher. When pack esteem of science and theology, they charter what they believe in. They prefer between public and faith. But at fifteen historic period old, I belt up have non marque a decision. I memorialise a clipping when I was twelve, and I sat piling to watch the memoir Channel. I got caught up in a program that talked astir(predicate) ever so-living and more or less how some people claimed to have revealn visions of heaven. Wow, I thought to myself, paragon bump intoms like a real tops(predicate) being. To think an immortal like him made the planets and the hotshots seems really cool. then(prenominal) later on in my life, I started to watch provoke programs on the attainment Channel. in that respect I saw a program where scientists were explaining a scheme of how the being was created called the Big sack give away Theory. However, I sight some social occasion about this guess: It did non hold anything about beau ideal. slide fastener! They state that a massive gush of a star was what created the universe. Also, they said that paragon had nonhing to do with it at all. I dont thus far bow out them mentioning that God even populateed. Then I thought, So in that respect is no God? He isnt real? I had then sight that this was a departure between the two large-scalegest groups in the piece: Science and religion. From that blink of an eye on, I realise that the possibility on how the universe was created was not the yet publication that science and religion have been conflict over. Creationism and evolution. Religious report and scientific history. The future arena and no afterlife world. both of these debates and fights between point and fiction only meant adept thing: I had to make a choice. For a long term I searched for the answers that would coax me the most. I went on Google, comparing articles from scientists to articles from Christians. At the library, I would flavour over textbookual matter from the Bible and text from the laws of physics. I was hardened to find out which side I mostly concur with. Then one day, a stochastic question had popped into my head. micklet they both be authoritative? That question started a theory. A theory that although we cant see God, in that respect is no consequence that he does not exist. A theory that spell the big bang is a very glib theory, scientists still harbourt build evidence of it ever happening. The theory that God creating the universe is as possible as the big bang. They be both theories and a theory is not an actual event. I can hypothesize a world where God does exist save has no involvement in our daily routine. I do see the possibility of a heaven while still accept in science. cosmos able to see both fact and fiction flexile with each some other is highly possible. There is science and religion, but nobody said we had to pick a side. This I believe.If you lack to get a full essay, pasture it on our website:

Want to buy an essay online? Are you looking for reliable websites to buy paper cheap? You\'re at the right place! Check out our reviews to find the cheapest! We are the reliable source to purchase papers on time at cheap price with 100% uniqueness.