Music Piracy Is a Good Thing

constipationony Piracy is a Good amour Pirating medication is one of the most reciprocal crimes in the world that happens every(prenominal)day. However, ones you read this essay, I hope you will see this production from a different perspective, it may non look the likes of such a terrible crime subsequently all. near ab turn up successful artists make in the tens of millions every course of study according to eHow. com. If thats the truth, how badly is plagiarism really hurting these pot? If medicament plagiarisation is effecting the artist so often then why do bulk of the artists argon living in mansions larger than the White Ho practise?If pirating medicament hurts medicinal drugians in line up so badly it would show, and after all this conviction of pirating medicament it hasnt. medicinal drug plagiarization benefits artists more than(prenominal) than it hurts, indeed it should be legal. Music piracy is mostly committed by concourse who be everyday de al who permit average income jobs and claim families who end up being sued by big book companies everyplace downloading music for free. It waits a snap to greedy when you look at the passing in conciliate between the artist and the people who download the songs. ( ) say that the people who depredator the music are more in all likelihood to go to the show and deprave the albums after downloading music (Ernesto).Also, people who pirate music tracks are very likely to develop an connection to the bands orartists and that will trace to them attending the shows, buying albums and merchandise. When putting this place in perspective, magnetic disk companies are just looking for specie without any contemplation for the ways of getting it. Record companies digress suing people who fix downloaded music for misfortunate amount of property in sweat to intimidate and scare off-key the fellons from downloading music punishablely. The main groups affected are college kids th at dont have the money.Sarah Barg was a sophomore at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Sarah original an email from a label community stating that she owed $3,000 to the Recording Industry Association of the States (Bratton). For that amount,, Sarah would be paying $7. 87 for from each one song. Majority of the songs she pirated were from the eighties and werent raze applicable anymore, and yet she was battling record companys in hail over them them. lx students like Sarah at UNL received the aforesaid(prenominal) similar, as well as one Cs direct out to over sixty different universities across the country. Not knowing ow else to turn the situation, Barg contacted her parents and they had to cover her settlement. I dont know what I would have done. Im merely 20 historic period old, says Barg. Well over five hundred students across the states have paid settlements to subjugate being sued. I see it as bullying, UNL freshman Andrew Johnson says, Legally, it makes sense , because we dont have the money to shake back. Johnson illegally downloaded one song and colonized $3,000 to avoid being sued for one song. The money used came from the 18 year olds college investment trust and he now has to work both jobs to compensate for his losses.The record companies seem to prey those cant fight back. In 2007, major record companies such as Warner music groups, Warner Bros Records, Inc. , and Sony BMG Music Entertainment, attempt to sue a untried girl from Texas named Whitney harper for illegally downloading music from accommodate sharing ne cardinalrks on the network (Malisow). Whitney was at the time was sixteen geezerhood old and was being sued for a borderline of $750 per song when Whitney downloaded thirtyseven songs. That is a little over $20,000 and she is only sixteen geezerhood old.Harper tried to use the Innocent Infringer Act that would stamp down fees to $200 per song. In order to follow up that, Harper had to prove she was unaware o f the remedy of first publication laws by claiming that the secure notice placed on cds were not on the file sharing networks on the lucre therefore she was unaware. The companies referred to the sixteen-year-old as a long destination massive infringer of copyright laws. Harper warned that if the companies win the case that downloading music off the earnings could never be innocent infringement. The Harper case is one the few after many a(prenominal) years quieten expiration through federal court.The companies had stated they were handout to begin transitioning away from suing individuals and find breach means of fixing the issue. After years of record companies using an intimidation manner to fix the pirating problem, it got them nowhere because the amount of pirates only went up, and the efforts by the companies were in most cases useless. fit in to the Wall Street Journal, they attempted suing many single mothers, a thirteen-year-old girl, and a executed peope. The new begin is for the companies to work with meshwork service providers and when music is eing pirated the user receives a warning that they will lose Internet service if they continue(WSJ. com). The companies save reserve the right to sue if someone is a dim violator or has ignored several(prenominal) warnings, but even with this new system, it palliate seems like the companies are only out for money, but in an attempt to explode negative attention from the media, they change their approach. tally to The Independent, people who illegally download music also spend more money on music, concerts, merchandises than anyone else.The Secretary of State for Business, pecker Mandelson, stated that the record companies new approach to crack down on illegal down loaders by cutting off internet service could potentially harm the music industry more than attend it. The people who file share are the ones who are interested in music. They use file sharing as a discovery mechanism. The a rtists also have motley opinions over file sharing, some such as James Blunt and Lily Allen are anti-piracy and Shakira is pro-piracy(Shields). Sites have come out with periodical bills for unlimited music plans that seem fairer.Some artists dont touch affected by file sharing and support the fact that piracy creates a bigger fan base for them. Bands like Angels and Airwaves have produced free records so copyright wasnt an issue. They figure that the fans will still come see them play and record gross sales arent the only thing to being in a successful band. Some artists dont seem to realize that. Most artists make grass off of record sales even with a piracy problem, so court cases and law suits on everyday people by record companies seems a cow chip greedy and selfish.Even with the new laws, they are still pushing to stop this unstoppable problem. like a shot music piracy is referred to as a dead issue. Most cases that are still pending are being dropped. This year a $54,00 0 fine on a single mother of four was dropped by the U. S. District Court Judge, Micheal Davis, who stated piracy is no longer monstrous and shocking. The have for deterrence cannot justify a two million verdict for stealing and distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music(physorg. om). Thomas Rasset was convicted in 2007 and was ordered to pay $220,000, but the judge who presided over the discharge called off the verdict, saying it was wholly disproportional and oppressive. Her case was one of the thousands that had actually make it to court. In 2011, with new laws, these cases should not be forgotten about. The people who lost cases should be compensated and apologized to because they did nothing other than have an interest in the artist.