DEVELOPMENT OF THE UK CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Essay

DEVELOPMENT OF THE UK CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - Essay usageThe paper reviews the development of unified brass and the outcomes of the changes since 1990 to the culmination of a combined code in 2003, and the conflict of the recent bank crisis on corporate governance structures (Lee 2006, p.36). The rise of Corporate Governance Since the 1980s, corporate governance issues have continued to perpetrate immense interests. Issues such as corporate fraud, corporate failure, and corporate collapse, additional of executive remuneration, abuse of management power, and corporate social and environmental responsibility gained prominence, and have continued to attract attention in media reports, academic debates, public forums, regulatory agendas, and governmental policy. However, despite the earlier concerns and subsequent regulatory endeavors, corporate governance issues became even more prominent and exposed with the onset of the global financial crisis 2007-10. Subsequently, most academics, policy analysts, and corporate practitioners have associated the severity and increasingly circular nature of the financial and stinting crisis to corporate governance failures, whether functional or technical (Sun, Stewart and Pollard 2011, p.16). In the 1980s, broader stakeholder concerns remained eclipsed by the market-driven, growth- oriented outlooks of Reaganite and Thatcher economics. The Directors responsibility to enhance stakeholder value was reinforced with profit performance models gaining prominence and shaping the foundation for the privatization of state-run entities. The holy terror of predator takeover bids (for the market control) was touted as a critical incentive for strong board-level performance. In the UK, the Guinness type and consequently, the collapse of Robert Maxwells companies brought to the fore the need for checks and balances (especially for boards dominated by powerful executive directors), as well as in cases where the posts of chief e xecutive and chairman of the board were merged, and the outside directors were weak (Boyd 1994, p.335). It was at this time that the concepts of corporate governance became the focus of attention in fact, the phrase itself was son to emerge. How Corporate harm Led to Growth of Corporate Governance The UK economy experienced a prolonged period of economic growth from 1981 to 1989 however, in the same period, there were a number of company failures arose with some manifesting spectacular collapses including Asil nadirs Polly Peck, Robert Maxwells MCC, plus the $8bn failure of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). These collapses overlap a number of similarities a recent clean bill of health from auditors, an ostentatious and powerful leader, an absence of action from non-executive directors and minimal participation with institutional investors (Smerdon 2010, p.5). These collapses stirred public concern, partly because of the massive involvement of legion(predicat e) of deposit holders in the collapse of BCCI and thousand of pensioners in the collapse of the Maxwell Empire, and also because of the overriding recognition that the UK industry was lagging behind economically compared to other countries with Europe. Hence, it can be argued that the evident failure or lack of accurate reporting in the majority of cases that would have otherwise allowed investors to spotlight the warning signs was the biggest pauperization for the drive for corporate governa